Friday, September 7, 2012

Response to Course Material -- Week 1, Sept 9th


Response to Course Material Week 1, September 9th 

The prezis I took notes on were filled with good ideas on reaching your audience so that your writing accomplishes something.  This got me thinking of the audience I will have come May when I'm taking the AP test.  The audience will all be very knowledgeable when it comes to literature and English, will have read many, many, other students' writing, and will be comparing what I say and do to the other students.  

So to please this audience, the tips in Essay Writing Basics are all beyond useful.  It's important to keep in mind the "Speaker/Persona; What kind of person do you want to seem like?"  And while I first thought it was silly to mention, "answer the prompt!" certainly has its uses too.   A summary of the facts is not good enough, but going deeper and asking WHY and HOW sets the good AP-student apart, and that is something I need to remember.  Quoting evidence, even while the audience has read the selections close to a million times, is key to a good grade.  The terms MUST be said and in the correct ways, to show those judges I know what I'm talking about.  And the essay must be persuasive, which leads into what The Rhetorical Situation was talking about. To be persuasive, your argument should be logically organized. It seems like I've understood the need of a strong intro, body, and conclusion since the 3rd grade, and for the AP test that's no exception.  This foreseen "act of communication" must communicate what I want it to in May, and it's never to early to begin thinking about it!

2 comments:

  1. Wow, this was very good. You really went into detail. I think you did a really nice job of having good examples and then elaborating on them. You also did a good job of incorporating quotes. It is crazy how much a supportive quotation enhances the authors point. It's hard for me to find anything wrong with this, especially for the first blog post of the school year! Nice job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You did a great job with detailing! You could have maybe broken up the second paragraph into two seperate ones. And you are lacking an introduction and a conclusion...but I don't know if that was required anyways. So overall this was very good and full of interesting details!

    ReplyDelete